|
Re: Density of Language Taxa: msg#00055science.linguistics.corpora
Those are interesting results, but for those of us who have never done any studies with such techniques, could you please point to some other web sites that have further background information. > Dear Corpora colleagues, please comment on the following... One question I would like to ask is how bilingualism with neighboring languages might affect the distribution of consonantal groups. Since Hungarian is an island in the middle of Indo-European, there are many native Hungarian speakers who are bilingual in one or more of the neighboring languages, as attested by the very large number of loan words from Slavonic and Germanic languages. Could that account for some of the dispersion in the following results: > It is possible to explain the great value of dispersion > of the Ugric group by the fact that the structure of the > Hungarian speech sound chain is too different from those > of Mansi and Hanty. How do you distinguish the effects of cognates vs. loan words vs. sound changes influenced by bilingualism? Is it possible to evaluate the dispersion in cognates only? Or to evaluate how much the cognates might have changed in the direction of the loan words? Or how much the loan words have been modified in the direction of the cognates? John Sowa |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: corpora of spoken English: 00055, Briony Williams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Corpus Linguistics 2007: 00055, Susan Hunston |
| Previous by Thread: | Density of Language Taxai: 00055, Yuri Tambovtsev |
| Next by Thread: | Q&A system for a given collection of document?: 00055, ben dbabis samira |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |