|
[Global Change: 2311] Re: Cost/benefit of human extinction: msg#00017science.general.global-change
On Dec 28, 9:07 am, Tom Adams <tadams...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > The value of a human life is around 10 million these days. > > Based on that, I figure that we can't justify spending 500 billion to > avoid extinction in 591 years. Sometime around July 4th, 2598 to be > exact. I'm greatly reminded of a calculation Mark Twain published on the length of the Mississippi river. Any sum compounded at a any positive rate of return will eventually exceed any fixed value. So? It is not worth spending US$0.01 to prevent extinction in year X. Year X will depend on the rate of return and the stated value of human species. at US$6*10^16 At a 10% real return, and US$6*10^16 valuation, X is about 2480. Amusing, and not very useful. Think also about the last year before extinction. What rate of return would you accept for a loan that would never be paid, as both the borrower and the lender would be dead? What rate of inflation might be expected, if money not spent will expire worthless? How could you define real rate of return? |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Global Change: 2310] Re: Public Awareness of Energy Issues: 00017, Michael Tobis |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Global Change: 2312] Re: Cost/benefit of human extinction: 00017, James Annan |
| Previous by Thread: | [Global Change: 2309] Cost/benefit of human extinctioni: 00017, Tom Adams |
| Next by Thread: | [Global Change: 2312] Re: Cost/benefit of human extinction: 00017, James Annan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |