|
[Global Change: 1058] Re: Energy companies consider CO2 legislation necessa: msg#00014science.general.global-change
Hi, Michael, that constraint is consistent with US law, but it is not true everywhere (for example Germany). I do agree with what you said. In the context of comments by Greg Easterbrook, <a href="http://rabett.blogspot.com/2006/09/greg-easterbrook-makes-interesting.html">I blogged on your point some time ago</a> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Global Change: 1057] Re: Exxon Spends Millions to Cast Doubt on Global Warming: 00014, Roger Coppock |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Global Change: 1059] economics and anthropogenic climate change: an analogy: 00014, Michael Tobis |
| Previous by Thread: | [Global Change: 1056] Re: Energy companies consider CO2 legislation necessaryi: 00014, Michael Tobis |
| Next by Thread: | [Global Change: 1092] Re: Energy companies consider CO2 legislation necessary: 00014, bill |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |