|
Re: Fw: Christine Large: msg#00013science.cryptography.bletchley-park
actually, it wasn't me saying, i just did the translation. (-: however, if memory serves, Ms. Large's performance, or lack thereof, whilst at BP, demonstrated a profound proclivity for the taurus by- product as opposed to actually accomplishing anything useful to the cause. i think the general opinion is that whatever new position she may have garnered was done by bullshit rather than by pointing to actually results at BP. for a number of years i spent a lot of time at BP, and a lot more time and effort promoting the cause. but i think that by bthe time she was on the scene i had given up, so i don't have any empirical knowledge of her effectiveness. however, to use another latin expression, "Res ipsa loquitur" (the thing speaks for itself). she was never very popular and her decision to essentially ban Tony S. from the park exacerbated an already bad situation. to be fair, it's got to be one of the most difficult and thankless things to do; to try to convince people to give real money to preserve something like BP. to those of us who understand and care, it's a no-brainer, but to those who don't, it's a very hard sell indeed. i knew one of her predecessors rather well, Roger B., the former Lord Mayor of MK, and i know how much he cared and how hard he tried, and in spite of his efforts, how little of what was needed he was able to provide. -paul On May 28, 2006, at 13:16, Bill Ridgeway wrote: Ok so now we understand what you were saying but I don't understand the context. A little more explanation please? |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Fw: Christine Large: 00013, Paul J. Bell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Fw: Christine Large: 00013, Matt R |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Fw: Christine Largei: 00013, Bill Ridgeway |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Fw: Christine Large: 00013, Matt R |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |