|
Re: Re: Re: Relocation of mailing list to Google Groups + rant: msg#00061science.chemistry.blue-obelisk
Am Mittwoch, den 30.05.2007, 12:32 +0100 schrieb Noel O'Boyle: [..] > The other point you raised was regarding the wiki. This will soon be > moving to SF, and I think that we will be implementing better spam > filtering (thanks go to Martin Walker for continually reverting all > that spam). I don't think we should allow anonymous edits on a wiki > that acts as a website for the blue obelisk; others may disagree. I > recently rearranged information on the wiki, and I'd appreciate any > more specific feedback you could give me regarding the layout. Short question: As Tobias mentioned, the Wiki did not have much content. There is also not an editorial team like CDK has/had. Many interesting stuff was "posted" via RSS and collected via a planet-software. So why not simply using the planet as homepage of blue-obelisk and collecting our mailing list via RSS too? We would just need some search functionality or omething similar. Is that possible? Or would you favour a Wiki? I mean, we were collecting data and such stuff. It shouldn't be a problem to create documentation that can be used to explain the one or the other collection of data/scripts/whatever, so we don't need a Wiki to collect information there (I mean, which chemical search possibilities do Wikis offer?). Just some thoughts going through my mind. Regards, Daniel |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: opendata QSAR data sets?: 00061, Andreas Bender, PhD |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Move of mailing list to SourceForge: 00061, Christoph Steinbeck |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Re: Relocation of mailing list to Google Groups + ranti: 00061, peter murray-rust |
| Next by Thread: | Move of mailing list to SourceForge: 00061, Christoph Steinbeck |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |