osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Re: [Gnu-darwin-distribution] a csd alternative - msg#00026

List: science.chemistry.blue-obelisk

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
Was this mail meant to go to the Blue Obelisk list? I don't know who it is from (we like to know the names, not just initials, of posters) and it doesn't follow the thread. Also it was crossmailed to two other lists.

P.


At 23:44 20/05/2007, m.m.w wrote:
Hi Mike,

can i forward to Institut Pasteur and CNRS-GIF ?

last year, i also met a guy from CEA Grenobles, who worked on
Molecular DB
he asked me some "advise" about DB Object Design , maybe it's an
another way to explore ...

-mmw

I would like to create an online archive of images of all the small
molecules that are available from WorldWideMolecularMatrix and other
sources that provide molecular coordinates.

http://www.dspace.cam.ac.uk/handle/1810/724

Some notes and links about the molecules could also be provided. Not
only would such an archive be immensely useful for many researchers
(including myself), but it could also provide the raw material for
Wikipedia stubs and other projects. I have a dual core Opteron at
gnu-darwin.org that is currently mostly idle at this time, and I would
really like to do this. I am familiar with the necessary molecular
coordinate formatting, rendering, image processing, and other software
that is required to do the project. Any suggestions on how to get the
required level of access to the molecular databases in order to get
this
done would be much appreciated. BTW, obviously we are talking free
and
open public access here.

How does http://molecules.gnu-darwin.org/ sound?

Please send me links to other small molecule coordinate archives, so
that I can get started right away. There are a few listed below too.

BTW, if someone has already done this, why is it not in Google, and
please point me to it. Thanks!

Regards,
Michael L. Love Ph.D
Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins University
725 N. Wolfe Street
Room 608B WBSB
Baltimore MD 21205-2185
Interoffice Mail: 608B WBSB, SoM

office: 410-614-2267
lab: 410-614-3179
fax: 410-502-6910
cell: 443-824-3451
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/


On 19 Dec, peter murray-rust wrote:

At 17:16 18/12/2006, proclus-x7PKJuapCgi0fEd0lbWiZA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:



I assume this mail came from Blue Obelisk - the header iws confused.




I would like to recommend the following alternatives to the csd
suite
for chemical database searches.

What is meant by csd? If this is the Cambridge Database then this
primarily only relevant if the alternative sources contains
crystallographic data.



These are open databases of chemical
substances, which you might find bound in your crystals as
substrates or
ligands. The databases can be downloaded in whole, or they are
tied in
to PubChem, thus conforming to the principle of public
accessibility.
Here are the links

http://chembank.broad.harvard.edu/

What are the license conditions on this. It is not available without
registering. And can the whole database be downloaded without further
permission?


http://biocyc.org/open-compounds.shtml

I learned about these tools on the Blue-obelisk list, which is
dedicated to FOSS tools in chemistry. Some of these folks are
working on the Wikipedia chemical specification formats or they have
agreed to do their scientific work in an open data-sharing
environment.
Nice work to them!

Regards,
Michael L. Love Ph.D
Department of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry
School of Medicine
Johns Hopkins University
725 N. Wolfe Street
Room 608B WBSB
Baltimore MD 21205-2185

Interoffice Mail: 608B WBSB, SoM

office: 410-614-2267
lab: 410-614-3179
fax: 410-502-6910
cell: 443-824-3451
http://www.gnu-darwin.org/




--
Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K-
w--- !O
M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e ++++
h--- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------





_______________________________________________
Blue-obelisk mailing list
Blue-obelisk-1MXgZGmSEouYropViTRrB8edHCjMHISts0AfqQuZ5sE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://hardly.cubic.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/blue-obelisk

Peter Murray-Rust
Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics
University of Cambridge,
Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069

Peter Murray-Rust
Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics
University of Cambridge,
Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069


Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

CrystalEye - Re: a csd alternative

I replied to Michael/Proclus on a different hread before I read BO as follows: This might as well act as a pre-formal announcement for CrystalEye. We see this as a rich source of accurate fragments for 3D molecular building Michael, This has come my way through CCP4BB. You are welcome to the coordinates from WWMM as long as you acknowledge source. It was slightly pre-CC licenses but they should impicitly carry CC-BY. The WWMM molecules are slightly difficult to extract en masse as the metadata are fully exposed by require a link to the data so you have to write a simple script. This was not anticipated when we first put them in. You may also be interested in http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye which aggregates structures from the current crystallographic literature with complete metadata. There is a also a 2D image autogenerated by CDK. You mention "image" - I suspect you mean 3D image but 2D are also important. We shall be extracting ca 30K structures/year in this way and we have a significant back archive. We would hesitate to use the term "CSD alternative" for CrystalEye - it does things that CSD does not do and vice versa. For example it is not comprehensive, but it is Open and creates/allows derivative works. We expect to create a search interface fairly soon probably based on RDF. P. At 19:12 18/05/2007, proclus-x7PKJuapCgi0fEd0lbWiZA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: On 18 May, Rajarshi Guha wrote: > Will these be 2D structure diagrams? Or ray traced 3D images? If the > former what is the need to store these? They could be easily > generated on the fly (either by local software or by web services > such as http://rguha.ath.cx:8080/cdkws/services/StructureDiagram? > wsdl). If the latter, what is the utility of static 3D images (apart > from the eye-candy aspect) Quick access in the browser window is the answer, accessible to anyone without special configuration. I haven't decided on line v. rendered diagrams. Maybe both. > You can get 3D coordinates for most of PubChem from http:// > www.chembiogrid.org/cheminfo/p3d - depending on the mode of access > (such as bulk downloads) you can get access to the underlying > database if needed. Thanks for the suggestions! Regards, Michael L. Love > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rajarshi Guha <rguha-GZvvpLG7cYSVc3sceRu5cw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > A sine curve goes off to infinity, or at least the end > of the blackboard. > -- Prof. Steiner > -- Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K- w--- !O M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e++++ h--- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ _______________________________________________ Blue-obelisk mailing list Blue-obelisk-1MXgZGmSEouYropViTRrB8edHCjMHISts0AfqQuZ5sE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://hardly.cubic.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/blue-obelisk Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Jumbo 5.4 beta 1 release

Hi all, I'm pleased to announce that 5.4 beta 1 has finally been released (sorry for the delay) and is available from the sourceforge site. Development on Jumbo's trunk is now version 5.5. 5.4b1 has been moved to a branch for bug fixes, and 5.4 will be released when the bugs die off. From the release report: - There is new and improved functionality in MoleculeTool, CrystalTool and ValencyTool thanks to developments on the CrystalEye project. We introduce CMLFragment which supports Markush and polymer structures. This release introduces a new version of schemagen that builds independently of jumbo and hence removes the bootstrapping problems with 5.3. Note however that jumbo is tightly coupled to a particular schema (here, 2.2). The conversion tools in the legacy2cml have been refactored into a separate release (coming soon...) in order to reduce the number of dependencies caused by the core code. Best regards, jim

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

CrystalEye - Re: a csd alternative

I replied to Michael/Proclus on a different hread before I read BO as follows: This might as well act as a pre-formal announcement for CrystalEye. We see this as a rich source of accurate fragments for 3D molecular building Michael, This has come my way through CCP4BB. You are welcome to the coordinates from WWMM as long as you acknowledge source. It was slightly pre-CC licenses but they should impicitly carry CC-BY. The WWMM molecules are slightly difficult to extract en masse as the metadata are fully exposed by require a link to the data so you have to write a simple script. This was not anticipated when we first put them in. You may also be interested in http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye which aggregates structures from the current crystallographic literature with complete metadata. There is a also a 2D image autogenerated by CDK. You mention "image" - I suspect you mean 3D image but 2D are also important. We shall be extracting ca 30K structures/year in this way and we have a significant back archive. We would hesitate to use the term "CSD alternative" for CrystalEye - it does things that CSD does not do and vice versa. For example it is not comprehensive, but it is Open and creates/allows derivative works. We expect to create a search interface fairly soon probably based on RDF. P. At 19:12 18/05/2007, proclus-x7PKJuapCgi0fEd0lbWiZA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: On 18 May, Rajarshi Guha wrote: > Will these be 2D structure diagrams? Or ray traced 3D images? If the > former what is the need to store these? They could be easily > generated on the fly (either by local software or by web services > such as http://rguha.ath.cx:8080/cdkws/services/StructureDiagram? > wsdl). If the latter, what is the utility of static 3D images (apart > from the eye-candy aspect) Quick access in the browser window is the answer, accessible to anyone without special configuration. I haven't decided on line v. rendered diagrams. Maybe both. > You can get 3D coordinates for most of PubChem from http:// > www.chembiogrid.org/cheminfo/p3d - depending on the mode of access > (such as bulk downloads) you can get access to the underlying > database if needed. Thanks for the suggestions! Regards, Michael L. Love > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rajarshi Guha <rguha-GZvvpLG7cYSVc3sceRu5cw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > GPG Fingerprint: 0CCA 8EE2 2EEB 25E2 AB04 06F7 1BB9 E634 9B87 56EE > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > A sine curve goes off to infinity, or at least the end > of the blackboard. > -- Prof. Steiner > -- Visit proclus realm! http://proclus.tripod.com/ -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GMU/S d+@ s: a+ C++++ UBULI++++$ P+ L+++(++++) E--- W++ N- !o K- w--- !O M++@ V-- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP-- t+++(+) 5+++ X+ R tv-(--)@ b !DI D- G e++++ h--- r+++ y++++ ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ _______________________________________________ Blue-obelisk mailing list Blue-obelisk-1MXgZGmSEouYropViTRrB8edHCjMHISts0AfqQuZ5sE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://hardly.cubic.uni-koeln.de/mailman/listinfo/blue-obelisk Peter Murray-Rust Unilever Centre for Molecular Sciences Informatics University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge CB2 1EW, UK +44-1223-763069

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Jumbo 5.4 beta 1 release

Hi all, I'm pleased to announce that 5.4 beta 1 has finally been released (sorry for the delay) and is available from the sourceforge site. Development on Jumbo's trunk is now version 5.5. 5.4b1 has been moved to a branch for bug fixes, and 5.4 will be released when the bugs die off. From the release report: - There is new and improved functionality in MoleculeTool, CrystalTool and ValencyTool thanks to developments on the CrystalEye project. We introduce CMLFragment which supports Markush and polymer structures. This release introduces a new version of schemagen that builds independently of jumbo and hence removes the bootstrapping problems with 5.3. Note however that jumbo is tightly coupled to a particular schema (here, 2.2). The conversion tools in the legacy2cml have been refactored into a separate release (coming soon...) in order to reduce the number of dependencies caused by the core code. Best regards, jim
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by