logo       

Re: 1.9 Installer: msg#02349

ruby-talk

Subject: Re: 1.9 Installer

Thanks for your reply Luis!
I sincerely appreciate your job developing ruby installer.

Actually, my question is about what differs this
http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/18566/ruby186-25.exe from this
ftp://ftp.ruby-lang.org/pub/ruby/binaries/mswin32/ruby-1.8.6-i386-mswin32.zip
except for the fact there is a instalation wizard :P

regards

Luis Lavena wrote:
> On Jul 30, 5:48ïpm, Bruno Sousa <brgso...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What differs those binaries ones from a installed (from one-click) ruby
>> ?
>
> The ones installed from former One-Click are built using Microsoft
> Visual C 6.0, that defines the Ruby platform as i386-mswin32.
>
> The new ones are built with MinGW (GCC) and the platform is i386-
> mingw32
>
> Both remains binary compatible because they link to the exact same C
> Runtime library (MSVCRT.DLL) but sometimes the gems compiled or built
> against VC6 will not work on MinGW, or viceversa.
>
> http://blog.mmediasys.com/2008/08/10/rubygems-with-power-comes-responsibility/
>
> The new shape of installer and the reason for be that way is better
> explained and covered here:
>
> http://wiki.github.com/oneclick/rubyinstaller/faq
>
> I made this announcement a few weeks ago:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.ruby/browse_thread/thread/c38255aacd68d6dc
>
> But you can search for all my answers at google groups (just search
> for Ruby Installer)
>
> Hope all this information helps.

--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Google Custom Search

News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise