----- Original Message -----
From: fedora-xen-request@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Saturday, February 25, 2006 12:00 pm
Subject: Fedora-xen Digest, Vol 3, Issue 23
> Send Fedora-xen mailing list submissions to
> fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> fedora-xen-request@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> fedora-xen-owner@xxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-xen digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. initscripts, xen and bonding (Axel Thimm)
> 2. Re: initscripts, xen and bonding (Bill Nottingham)
> 3. Re: initscripts, xen and bonding (Axel Thimm)
> 4. how to search hypervisor like rpm -qa | grep hypervisor
> (Chitlesh GOORAH)
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:13:11 +0100
> From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Fedora-xen] initscripts, xen and bonding
> To: fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060224231311.GP21359@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a hard time getting bonding to work on FC5t3. It looks like
> the bond0 interface bond0 is renamed to pbond0 by xen [*] and the
> enslaving does not work anymore then. It works if I log on the
> terminal and ifenslave the devices to pbond0 instead of bond0 after
> the boot process has finished.
>
> But I want this to be handled automatically during reboots, so I tried
> assigning the bonding slaves to pbond0 as a master in the
> ifcfg-eth{0,1} scripts, but that doesn't work.
>
> What is causing the bond0 rename and should this renaming be
> considered by initscript? Is this a user error or should I file this
> against bugzilla? xen or initscripts?
>
> Thanks!
>
> [*] The only reference I found was a Japanese site and google's
> translation of it.
>
>
> http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=ja&u=http://hoop.euqset.org/archives/001619.html--
>
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 191 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-
> xen/attachments/20060225/3a94cf69/attachment.bin
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:28:20 -0500
> From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] initscripts, xen and bonding
> To: fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060224232820.GD5644@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > I'm having a hard time getting bonding to work on FC5t3.
>
> Not surprising. The way Xen does its bridging breaks bonding
> fairly badly.
>
> It's possible it could be fixed in the xen scripts, but I don't
> think it's been looked at.
>
> Bill
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 00:54:43 +0100
> From: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Fedora-xen] Re: initscripts, xen and bonding
> To: fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx, fedora-test-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <20060224235443.GR21359@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2006 at 06:28:20PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Axel Thimm (Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
> > > I'm having a hard time getting bonding to work on FC5t3.
> >
> > Not surprising. The way Xen does its bridging breaks bonding
> > fairly badly.
> >
> > It's possible it could be fixed in the xen scripts, but I don't
> > think it's been looked at.
>
> are the xen scripts called by initscripts? E.g. will this logic be
> encapsulated in such a way that an ifdown/ifup on bond0 outside the
> boot sequence would do the right thing w/o initscripts knowing
> anything more about xen, or would initscripts still require some
> special xen handling?
>
> I haven't looked to deeply into xen, so I may be missing the obvious
> here.
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 191 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-
> xen/attachments/20060225/45612410/attachment.bin
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2006 14:22:55 +0100
> From: "Chitlesh GOORAH" <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Fedora-xen] how to search hypervisor like rpm -qa | grep
> hypervisor
> To: fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <13dbfe4f0602250522w15d18998w1295792929f7b0af@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> hai there
> i got a question related with rpm
>
> for mi in ts.dbMatch ('name', 'kernel'):
>
> it searches for kernel
> good. now I want it to search for 'hypervisor' ?
>
> it is not a 'release' nor a 'name'
>
> what is it?
>
> Chitlesh GOORAH
>
> --
> http://clunixchit.blogspot.com
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-xen mailing list
> Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
>
>
> End of Fedora-xen Digest, Vol 3, Issue 23
> *****************************************
>
--
Fedora-xen mailing list
Fedora-xen@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
|
