On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 02:17:30PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
>
> >btw i didn't see an acknowledgement from the person who sent the
> >last udev patch (dan was it you?)
> >
> >the use of the "mode" argument it is clear has not been used,
> >to call i think it was matchpathcon.
> >
> >instead, because i had three near-identical code portions all
> >of which had different S_IFXXX thingies, dan-i-think-it-was
> >moved the near-identical code into a function with a "mode"
> >argument...
> >
> >... and forgot to use the "mode" argument such that matchpathcon
> >is called with S_IFDIR.
> >
> >given that i haven't seen an acknowledgement of this issue
> >either in my inbox or on the mailing lists (which i am checking
> >manually) i thought it best to hassle people until i know it's
> >been spotted.
> >
> >this is IMPORTANT because it will impact the contexts on
> >inodes and stuff created in /dev: the "optimising" argument
> >"mode" passed to matchpathcon and setfscreatecon, if wrong,
> >results in relevant (and correct!) file_context entries being
> >skipped!
> >
> >l.
> >
> >On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 05:37:17PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>On Sun, 29 Aug 2004 04:29, Tom London <selinux@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Newest Rawhide updates (including udev-030-10, mkinitrd-4.1.8-1,
> >>>kernel-2.6.8-1.532, and selinux-policy-strict-1.17.5-2)
> >>>now boots in strict/enforcing.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>I've attached a diff against the CVS policy as well as the .te and .fc
> >>files for udev changes which fix this and address some other issues as
> >>well.
> >>
> >>
> >--
> >fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> >fedora-selinux-list@xxxxxxxxxx
> >http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
> >
> >
> Yes it was me and I modified out udev rpm, but I guess I never
> responded. Sorry about that.
not a problem, just making sure.
i have to manually check the fedora-selinux list: if you did i
must have missed it.
*whew*.
l.
|
