Axel Thimm wrote:
> There was a suggestion (Nov 2003?) to "rename" RHL7.3 etc. to
> FC0.7.3 etc. in order to get the disttag issues straightened out
> (the natural disttag "rh9" is not rpm-less than "fc1").
I figured something as such, but didn't want to ass-u-me anything.
I always wondered why they they just didn't call it Fedora Core 10,
leaving a "hint" that it was related, without the trademark issues.
So makes you wonder if it would have not been better after all with
the disttag issues!
> If I am not wrong fedora.us is using a similar scheme with stripped
> away distids, i.e. they don't use fc0.7.3 but plain 0.7.3 in the
> versioning.
Yeah, I thought I saw something somewhere in the SRPMS
(or am I talking out of my ass about something else?).
> FWIW I would very much welcome a common versioning scheme for RHL
> & FC that could look like
> fc0.7.3 < fc0.8.0 < fc0.9 < fc1 < fc2 < fc2.90 etc
> The confusion will be high, and unless all packaging parties use
> the same semantics users will be lost.
Yeah, that's that problem. How far do you go?
Do you just use my suggestion, only changing the "legacy" "redhat-
release" package?
Or do we go so far to re-spin the whole, still legacy-supported
0.7.3 and 9 releases with lots of various trademark modifications,
although we leave some of the 7.3/9 references for compatibility?
At
> The discussion in the past has shown very low to none interest
> by RH, and N^2 disttag suggestions from N 3rd parties, so there
> is low chance of anything happening.
That's sad. I _am_ understanding of what Red Hat decided to do,
and their "hands are tied" for trademark reasons which is why
most of the confusion exists. But they _could_ have at least
thought of these things _beforehand_.
Oh well, I guess the best thing we can do is just use the
nomenclature everywhere. When I reference _any_ release now,
I list it as a "Fedora Core" release, typically with a "Lx.x"
in front of it, and then an optional tag of either "[current],"
"[legacy]" or "[retired]".
E.g.,
Fedora Core L6.2 [retired]
Fedora Core L7.2 [retired]
Fedora Core L7.3 [legacy]
Fedora Core L8 [retired]
Fedora Core L9 [legacy]
Fedora Core 1 [current]
Fedora Core 2 [current]
I then replace the "L" with "0." in any formal files/versions.
-- Bryan
P.S. Is Fedora Core 1 becoming "legacy" anytime soon? We're
almost to 1 year now.
--
Linux Enthusiasts call me anti-Linux.
Windows Enthusisats call me anti-Microsoft.
They both must be correct because I have over a
decade of experience with both in mission critical
environments, resulting in a bigotry dedicated to
mitigating risk and focusing on technologies ...
not products or vendors
--------------------------------------------------
Bryan J. Smith, E.I. b.j.smith at ieee.org
--
fedora-legacy-list mailing list
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list
|
