Has anyone here noticed that the css declarations removes the
capabilities of various docbook elements?
For instance, I have some data that I have put into a table. I followed
all semantics of the CALS table attributes that docbook utilizes. Yet, I
am unable to successfully alter the table attributes and their
appropriate values to achieve the desired outcome --- because of html
attribute inclusion by css.
i.e.
<table id="entities" frame="all"><title>Demonstration Entities and
Relationships</title>
<tgroup cols="3" align="left" colsep="0" rowsep="0">
<thead>
...
Now this should result in the following:
A framed table with three columns, all aligned to the left, and all rows
and columns NOT seperated.
But instead I get a framed table with a header background color of
#a9a9a9, a body background color of #dcdcdc, all aligned to the left,
and all rows and columns ARE seperated.
To do this, i should have declared so using the bgcolor and border
attributes. This breaks the element.
Thomas
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
|
