-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 23:21, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I don't see a need to standardize just for the sake of it; if this is
> something that authors are expected to do for themselves, that's ducky
> by me. I just don't want to step on any toes since I'm new to this part.
I think is a nice idea. Not just for the sake of it, but because I think it
will be useful.
Writers will end up doing similar things, using similar entities, so I think
establishing a standard to all docs would be a Good Thing, since it would
spare the writers the time to do it again and again to every doc.
My 2 cents, though.
- --
Luiz Rocha <lsdr@xxxxxxxx>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/xfRkN2+4JlrxCYYRAkgaAKCWYB1oBA4JtT7MO0NWfhxtYbg3jACfZ4sa
fLyU9M70dUAZyixtkqN5yQ4=
=U5SC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
|
