Subject: Re: Aboout Winsync - msg#00082

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

Aboout Winsync

Hi! I followed the steps of Red Hat document to implement Windows 2000 sync with FDS. After my "initial re-synchronization" process was done, I checked my directory tree. I saw some entries like "cn=Domain Admins, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com", and it contained "Members/Static Group - uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in its properties. But I could not find the real entry dn named "uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in my ds tree. Is it the correct result? Or I did something wrong with configuration. Please tell me how to fix the problem.  Thanks a lot. Regards Joe Yu

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: Aboout Winsync

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. joe wrote: I followed the steps of Red Hat document to implement Windows 2000 sync with FDS. After my "initial re-synchronization" process was done, I checked my directory tree. I saw some entries like "cn=Domain Admins, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com", and it contained "Members/Static Group - uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in its properties. But I could not find the real entry dn named "uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in my ds tree. Is it the correct result? Or I did This looks wrong. The double comma in the DN should be illegal. I don't believe this is a known problem -- I've never seen this particular issue reported before. Do you otherwise get correct sync results ? i.e. do your regular users and groups get sync'ed ok ? If you enable replication logging, then run a re-sync, there will probably be something in the error log pertaining to this entry. That might tell us what's going wrong.

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Aboout Winsync

Hi! I followed the steps of Red Hat document to implement Windows 2000 sync with FDS. After my "initial re-synchronization" process was done, I checked my directory tree. I saw some entries like "cn=Domain Admins, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com", and it contained "Members/Static Group - uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in its properties. But I could not find the real entry dn named "uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in my ds tree. Is it the correct result? Or I did something wrong with configuration. Please tell me how to fix the problem.  Thanks a lot. Regards Joe Yu

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

Re: Aboout Winsync

This is a multi-part message in MIME format. joe wrote: I followed the steps of Red Hat document to implement Windows 2000 sync with FDS. After my "initial re-synchronization" process was done, I checked my directory tree. I saw some entries like "cn=Domain Admins, ou=People, dc=example, dc=com", and it contained "Members/Static Group - uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in its properties. But I could not find the real entry dn named "uid=Administrator, , ou=People, dc=example, dc=com" in my ds tree. Is it the correct result? Or I did This looks wrong. The double comma in the DN should be illegal. I don't believe this is a known problem -- I've never seen this particular issue reported before. Do you otherwise get correct sync results ? i.e. do your regular users and groups get sync'ed ok ? If you enable replication logging, then run a re-sync, there will probably be something in the error log pertaining to this entry. That might tell us what's going wrong.