Le ven 01/10/2004 à 13:28, Paul Nasrat a écrit :
> Issues with initscripts, alsa and udev interoperability:
I know this. A spend time with udev to have something like scsi_id but
with ide. Works well here :-). Not "released" because not very useful (I
do it for fun) and it's in alpha stage (perhaps it will stay).
> The above is a bug in initscripts - it should be reported in bugzilla.
No bug in initscripts here.
Feel free to file a bug report if you want.
> * You say that asound.conf is for the end-user.
Only one time I complain about this issue and don't "bloat" bugzilla
with this. I state that is not the opinion of Red Hat and don't I speak
about this again.
proof : My version of system-config-soundcard use /etc/asound.conf even
if I don't like this. And I don't plan to add this "feature".
> Asking you to break down your request into manageable chunks.
I can't/don't want. Too much work.
> Again this is a problem related to udev, etc.
Please, read the bug report !
I (Bill first in mailing), say this should be resolve with udev, And I
ask to move this issue to udev :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=133535#c11
Note, I ask again to move this bug to udev :
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2004-October/msg00004.html
And in this bug I am not taking about asound.conf.
So please, stop this !
You are confusing other people (if there is some else ready this
"stupid" thread).
> patchutils can help with diff management - if you haven't used them I
> really suggest you play with them.
Well, I am a full time developer (C mostly) from 8 years, but thank to
the advice.
> If you don't have time to break it down, but have an explanation of
> everything you are doing
Already done.
> I can't do this right now, but can you
> post a NEW post to the list with just a link to your patch
Already pointed :
http://feliciano.matias.free.fr/system-config-soundcard/
> set to fedora-patches-list
Never asked to include my patch in FC3. I state from the very beginning
that's to late.
> and join #fedora-bugweek on irc.freenode.net to poke
> people to triage your patches.
Don't like irc because English :-)
I am putting some bugs report in bugzilla in the hope to make things
more clear.
> One think I'm thinking of - which other config maintainers may have
> opinions on is moving development in freeze to a branch so things can
> still proceed.
Right now, I don't have problem with how Red Hat manage the Fedora
project. Only pointed sometimes that communication in general is laking
and about rpm not signed.
> One of the things I'm trying to explain is *why* we like
> to have split patches broken down by bug or individual feature.
Since I am a developer, I know this :-)
And you should know that sometime it's not possible/easy to have "sweet"
independent patchs for a stable version. This is why there are Linux 2.4
and 2.5 for example. This is why backport can be so hard, ...
> I reiterate, that I personally found it hard to read.
OK, sometimes I am not perfect :-)
> when you are done why not post a mail summarising the bug
> numbers here.
This will be done.
Don't get me wrong. I LOVE Red Hat and Fedora and I use Red Hat since
release 4.2 and at home exclusively linux since rh5.2.
Red Hat is a very respectable company which do a _very_ great jobs in
improving GNU/Linux.
Really, I am honest.
It's not the first time I am here in debugging or helping other
testers/developers. Mainly things goes well.
I don't like to reply to this kind of message because you are mostly
right. But you seems to treat me as a newbie that need some advice to
work with the community.
It's not the first time I work with the community (not only with Red
Hat) nor the last. I am not a "popular" nor a great hacker, but if I
feel I can help, I do.
Sure I need some advices. But I am not a newbie :-)
Can you image Bastien don't manage well his communication with me ?
Seems you don't.
Forget this, there is nothing "serious".
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e=2E?=
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
|
