On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 23:35, Sulyok Peti wrote:
> 2004-08-30, h keltezéssel 15:38-kor Bastien Nocera ezt írta:
> > Why start a new project, when you could instead integrate Firestarter in
> > the distribution?
> >
> > http://firestarter.sourceforge.net/
> >
> > One thing that could be done is integrating Fieryfilter in firestarter.
> >
> > Fieryfilter does the same kind of job Firestarter does, but with GUI
> > feedback, much akin to what Windows firewalls do:
> > http://www.stud.uni-hamburg.de/users/lennart/projects/fieryfilter/
> >
> > Another thing that could be integrated would be wondershaper:
> > http://lartc.org/wondershaper/
> > And the only config option for that tool, the network speed, could be
> > detected automatically with a page like:
> > http://promos.mcafee.com/speedometer/test_0150.asp
> >
> > But integrating Firestarter to have GUI feedback, and an "easy setup"
> > option (much like the current firewall in anaconda, or in MacOS X) would
> > be a much better option.
> >
> ...snip...
> One reason is the following.
> Quote from fedora.redhat.com:
> >>>>>
> The configuration tools are written with the following development
> tools:
> * Python2.2 - for general development
> * PyGtk2 - for the graphical user interfaces
> <<<<<
It's a bonus, not a requirement. Python is great in that case because it
reduces the maintenance overhead when compared to C. But when you're
integrating an already existing tool, the overhead is low anyway...
> An other reason is that I like iptables as it is, but I also like
> clicking with the mouse.
> So I try to write a Python program controlled by mouse and reflecting
> iptables.
Right, but I can tell you from the start, unless it provides at least
the same amount of features Firestarter does (or even the current tool),
I don't see your tool getting in the distro.
Your choice.
Cheers
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
|
