The whole thing could always be a cover story to hide an association to
"the industry" that he might not be so proud of. Perhaps a hiding in
plain sight sort of thing. Maybe once someone brought it to his
attention he decided to quell the barrage of questions that he would
get over the issue with the concocted plan to make it look like he sued
the writer and let him go, thus making it look like he forgave the
so-called writer when in fact he couldn't sue him in the first place
because the so-called writer was himself.
Maybe I'm just going overboard.
On Jul 29, 2005, at 5:26 PM, Larry Dunn wrote:
From: Harold Johnson <harold.johnson@xxxxxxxxx>
So (and my apologies if anyone else has already
asked this question), is Joseph Minion A.K.A. Joe
Frank?
Well, considering that it's been much discussed in
this thread that JF sued Minion over the plaigarism,
my guess would be, no, Joseph Minion is not Joe Frank.
Unless he sued himself, of course! :p
__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour:
http://tour.mail.yahoo.com/mailtour.html
_______________________________________________
Joe Frank Mailing List
joe-frank-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.armory.com/mailman/listinfo.cgi/joe-frank-list
