logo       

Re: 2.5.5 release soon: msg#00029

python.wxpython.devel

Subject: Re: 2.5.5 release soon

On Wed, 06 Apr 2005 05:00:58 +0300, Ron <ron@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 02:53:57PM -0700, Robin Dunn wrote:
>I've said it before, I'll say it again... with the exception of few
>preview releases *ALL* wxpython releases from the 2.5 branch proved
>just as stable as 2.4.2.4 yet many people still remain with 2.4.2.4
>because that is "the latest stable release".

Yep.

Part of this is a distribution issue. It may seem initially paradoxical
to realise that wxPython at any given moment is generally more stable
than the library it is 'built on', but anecdotally it seems to often
be the case.

I think is due to the glue.... a lot of problems get caught in the glue layer ;)

That makes things hard, because pressure comes from the Python community
to release the underlying lib before _it_ is ready.

you'll never be able to make the lib "perfect"... that's why I think scheduled releases make sense. They impose discipline too... (1-2 months API freeze before release would be great).

wx2.5 is certainly not a stable library, however 'bug free' wxPython may
be. You seem to be confusing these two things. All wxPython releases
are **by definition** 'stable' -- ie. we don't change them any more.

Again with the glue.... I think wxpython "stability" is due to the lack of the low level bugs, is due to the marriage with python ;)

Hopefully the C++ library team will move into the mode of testing and
careful changes that have been employed here for the last several months
once it is declared 'stable' too. At least the last minute API changes
should slow a little I hope, and the chances of a tagged release actually
building will increase...

sometimes too much freedom can hurt too. Dictatorship is good if the dictator is a benevolent one ;)
I don't understand how project management issues can "degrade into a flaming tornado of death" when is crystal clear, at least in my view, the fact that Robin has the best overview of the wx project since he works full time on it, his opinion should weight a lot more that the opinion of any other developer. I'm not saying that he should slice and dice as he pleases BUT his position should prevent the flaming. Let them vote on it if they think themselves as democratic.

my 2 c.

Ron

--
Peter Damoc
Warrior Of The Light
http://www.sigmacore.net/


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise