Re: pyrex vs. gcc -Wall

Hi,

> I don't accept that the code generator needs to be
> "fixed", because I don't regard it as broken. The
> code it generates is perfectly correct. Its only
> crime is not conforming to some C compiler writer's
> notion of what spotlessly tidy C code should look
> like. That's completely irrelevant for Pyrex-
> generated code, since humans aren't required to
> ever look at it.

In the rare cases where the C compiler gives an error on Pyrex-generated
code, I've found it desirable to read the C code to diagnose the problem.
It happened to me a few times when using function pointers and casts
(IIRC). Pyrex would generate C code but gcc would choke on it.

That's when you realize that C code generated by Pyrex is not very
readable ;-P
But Pyrex is a great tool anyway.

Regards

Antoine.