Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions

Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Ivan Krstić schrieb:
>> 1) Having a large, canonical repository of useful Python code that's
>> much more encompassing than Cheeseshop would be a good thing for Python.
> 
> It's probably due to deficiencies in my mastering of the English
> language: What do you mean by "encompassing" here?
> 
> If you are requesting that all Python software in the world should
> be listed in a canonical repository, I say that the Cheeseshop *is*
> that canonical repository. If some package isn't listed, it's the
> "fault" of the author of the package and its users, not the fault
> of the Cheeseshop. I can't see how a *different* repository could
> have any chance of becoming canonical.

Agreed - I don't have any problems with Cheeseshop as it exists today.

-- Talin

_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@xxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/gcpd3-python-3000%40m.gmane.org