logo       

Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: msg#00131

python.python-3000.devel

Subject: Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions


On Oct 16, 2006, at 6:48 AM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:

Greg Ewing schrieb:
Which it *shouldn't* have to do. Timestamp checking
is fundamental to any kind of build process. It
should be built into the very foundations of the tool,
not left for each extension to re-invent separately.

And indeed, distutils already has support for that:
distutils.dep_util offers a couple of routines that
do time-stamp checking.

This points to at least part of the problem: there is very little useful documentation on how to extend, or even use, distutils.

Ronald

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise