|
Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: msg#00128python.python-3000.devel
Ronald Oussoren wrote: > Even then easy_install support won't be univeral. I still run into > packages that don't use distutils, mostly stuff that is or was part of > a larger C code base. However, at least there would be One Obvious Way for those that do want to use a standard build system. Something that might help is if there were a way for distutils to use something external, such as a Makefile-based build process, as a component of the overall build process. Currently distutils likes to be in charge of everthing, which can be inconvenient. How well would setuptools or zc.build handle this sort of thing? -- Greg |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: 00128, Greg Ewing |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: 00128, "Martin v. Löwis" |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additionsi: 00128, Ronald Oussoren |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: 00128, "Martin v. Löwis" |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |