|
Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: msg#00088python.python-3000.devel
> The standard library is not about easeness of installation. It is about > having > a consistent fixed codebase to work with. I don't want to go Perl/CPAN, > where you have 3-4 alternatives to do thing A which will never > interoperate > with whatever you chose among the 3-4 alternatives to do thing B. Currently in Python: http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.dom.html http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.dom.minidom.html http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.sax.html http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.parsers.expat.html http://docs.python.org/lib/module-xml.etree.ElementTree.html The problem of "consistent fixed codebase" is that standards get higher, so eventually those old stable modules lose popularity in favor of newer, better modules. Therefore, you have to obsolete old stuff if you want there to be only One Obvious Way To Do It. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Alternatives to 'outer': 00088, Antoine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: 00088, Fredrik Lundh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additionsi: 00088, Giovanni Bajo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Proposal: No more standard library additions: 00088, Fredrik Lundh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |