|
Re: EasyExtend meets Pyrex: msg#00017python.pyrex
kay schluehr wrote: > Otherwise backtranslation to source code is > technically trivial and can always be done. It is just not that I'm a > strong adherent to the Unix philosophy and seek for a more intimate > component coupling ;) Another thing to consider is that the details of the Pyrex parse tree could change, as I haven't been considering it a part of the public interface. > A disadvantage of the approach I have obviously overlooked in my > enthusiasm yesterday, are the limitations of Pyrex relative to Python, Most of them probably wouldn't be much of a problem, e.g. list comprehensions could be converted into equivalent loops much like the Python compiler does. The main thing that would be difficult to translate is generators. -- Greg |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: EasyExtend meets Pyrex: 00017, kay schluehr |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Circular cimports: 00017, Mike Wyatt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: EasyExtend meets Pyrexi: 00017, kay schluehr |
| Next by Thread: | irc?: 00017, Mark Heslep |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |