|
Re: Kate? or other Linux editor?: msg#00018python.pyrex
Z'm Themma 'Re: [Pyrex] Kate? or other Linux editor?' heigit Charles Hixson folgides vo' sich gae: > > I don't see any advantages in SciTE over NEdit. errm, no - yes - no ;) SciTE offers a lot of hidden goodies if you look into the global-, user,- local- property files (like saving open buffers as sessions, sic!) Eg if using Pauls pyximport, you run pyrex stuff directly with one keystroke, so SciTE becomes a very light IDE(-alike). I used NEdit for years, but had to move away when UTF support became more and more important and NEdit couldn't serve that time. And if you have to use a 1024x768 TFT you don't go back to something non-aliased (SciTE <-> gtk2). Not a matter of eye-candy but a matter of sanity ;) > Kate has a "pseudo- > project-pane" in the window that lets one keep all files in the > project available at once, which I find desireable. see above, just allow SciTE to tab. I do avoid brontosaurus-KDE related stuff whenever possible, but actually I use (& like) Kate also a lot for editing Zope objects via ftp. -- "As the poet said, "Only God can make a tree" -- probably because it's so hard to figure out how to get the bark on." - Woody Allen -
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Kate? or other Linux editor?: 00018, Charles Hixson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Team Pyrex Mission Statement: 00018, Lenard Lindstrom |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Kate? or other Linux editor?i: 00018, Charles Hixson |
| Next by Thread: | How to specify __contains__ method?: 00018, Gary Bishop |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |