|
Re: Re: random number facilities in numarray and main Python libs: msg#00072python.numeric.general
Faheem Mitha wrote: On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 16:35:11 -0700, Robert Kern <rkern@xxxxxxxx> wrote:I would agree, which is why I don't like the current move to put all kinds of processing facility into numarray. It is creating two parallel efforts and causing a split in the community. The purpose of SciPy was to collect scientific algorithms together (scipy's random number facilities are borrowed and enhanced from Numeric --- same place numarray comes from). -Travis O. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Problems with installation of version 23.3: 00072, Stephen Walton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | dot!=matrixmultiply bug when dotblas is present: 00072, Fernando Perez |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: random number facilities in numarray and main Python libsi: 00072, Faheem Mitha |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Re: random number facilities in numarray and main Python libs: 00072, Perry Greenfield |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |