Re: random number facilities in numarray and main Python libs

Faheem Mitha wrote:
[snip]
> Are the random number facilities provided by numarray.random_array 
> superior to those provided to those provided by the random module in the 
> Python library? They certainly seem more extensive, and I like the 
> interface better.
>
> If so, why not replace the random module by the equivalent functionality 
> from numarray.random_array, and have everyone use the same random number 
> generator? Or is this impossible for practical reasons?

numarray.random_array can generate arrays full of random numbers. 
Standard Python's random does not and will not until numarray is part of 
the standard library. Standard Python's random also uses the Mersenne 
Twister algorithm which is, by most accounts, superior to RANLIB's 
algorithm, so I for one would object to replacing it with numarray's 
code.  :-)

I do intend to implement the Mersenne Twister algorithm for SciPy's PRNG 
facilities (on some unspecified weekend). I will also try to code 
something up for numarray, too.

> By the way, what is the name of the pseudo-random number generator being 
> used? I see that the code is in Packages/RandomArray2/Src, but could not 
> see where the name of the generator is mentioned.

<URL:http://orion.math.iastate.edu/burkardt/c_src/ranlib/ranlib_base.txt>
documents the base algorithm.

>                                                                 Faheem.

--
Robert Kern
rkern@xxxxxxxx

"In the fields of hell where the grass grows high
 Are the graves of dreams allowed to die."
  -- Richard Harter


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click