|
Re: Empty arrays strange behaviour: msg#00052python.numeric.general
On Wed, 2004-08-18 at 07:36, Nadav Horesh wrote: > >>> a = arange(20, shape=(4,5)) > >>> a > array([[ 0, 1, 2, 3, 4], > [ 5, 6, 7, 8, 9], > [10, 11, 12, 13, 14], > [15, 16, 17, 18, 19]]) > >>> a[2:4,5:7] # Shouldn't it raise index error? > array([]) I wasn't sure about this, but what we're doing is faithful to what Numeric does. > >>> a[2:4, 5:7].iscontiguous() > 0 # ???? Likewise here. > >>> a[2:4, 5:7].copy().iscontiguous() > 0 # ???? We're not compatible here. > Shouldn't iscontiguous method of empty arrays and array.copy() return 1? I'd say we should go with compatibility. Todd ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Empty arrays strange behaviour: 00052, Nadav Horesh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Bool array missing sum function.: 00052, Todd Miller |
| Previous by Thread: | Empty arrays strange behaviouri: 00052, Nadav Horesh |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Empty arrays strange behaviour: 00052, Nadav Horesh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |