|
Re: Bug in built in SVD?: msg#00033python.numeric.general
Nadav Horesh wrote: It can be a bit more complicate, the story is this: I had the same issue, and got this reply from this very list: Mats Klingberg wrote: I recently did this under Gentoo. It seems that the atlas package doesn't build a complete lapack, which is necessary. Instead I emerged the newer blas-atlas and lapack-atlas packages. These build a complete lapack library with atlas optimizations. They are however masked with ~x86 so you have to add the following to your /etc/portage/package.keywords: I haven't had a chance to try it yet, but I will soon. -Chris -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer NOAA/OR&R/HAZMAT (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception Chris.Barker@xxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Bug in built in SVD?: 00033, Nadav Horesh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: matrixmultiply problem: 00033, Alan G Isaac |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Bug in built in SVD?i: 00033, Nadav Horesh |
| Next by Thread: | masked arrays and nd_image: 00033, Curzio Basso |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |