|
Re: matrixmultiply problem: msg#00029python.numeric.general
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 11:05:07PM -0400, Geoffrey Philbrick wrote: > Executing the following code has the side effect of modifying one of > the arguments (matrices) I passed to matrixmultiply. Note that the > matrix m2 changes after the call to matrixmultiply. This is on Windows > with numarray 1.0. Wow, that's bad. Since I had nothing better to do [1], I tracked it down and submitted a patch (#1007730) to SourceForge to fix this. [1] actually, I do, but... -- |>|\/|< /--------------------------------------------------------------------------\ |David M. Cooke http://arbutus.physics.mcmaster.ca/dmc/ |cookedm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | matrixmultiply problem: 00029, Geoffrey Philbrick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Bug in built in SVD?: 00029, Nadav Horesh |
| Previous by Thread: | matrixmultiply problemi: 00029, Geoffrey Philbrick |
| Next by Thread: | Re: matrixmultiply problem: 00029, Todd Miller |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |