Hi Ian,
Ian Bicking wrote:
> I really want to take all our HTML-related routines and put them into a
> proper package -- right now they are scattered all over the place.
> lhtml seems like a nice name for this. I thought it would be good to
> also place it on codespeak, but I'm not sure where. New top-level? In
> /lxml/lhtml/(trunk|branches|tags) ?
Are they based on lxml.etree or rather ET compatible? In the first case, I'd
make them a module of lxml (part of the same project), in the second case, it
might be worth a separate project.
Note that lxml already has quite a number of modules like lxml.sax and
lxml.objectify, so lxml.html would nicely fit in here.
Stefan
|
