Il giorno lun, 13-12-2004 alle 11:47 +0100, Andreas Degert ha scritto:
[snip]
> Naming the type psycopg._psycopg.connection would work. Of course, if
> _psycopg is put into sys.path and imported directly then it lies about
> its module again... but one can argue that _psycopg is designed to be
> part of that module package and not as a standalone module.
thank you for the explanation. even without knowing how pydoc works what
i meant to say in my previous email was that i would be using the
psycopg._psycopg.connection name. it was a type on my part but if a get
a nice explanation on something i don't know for every typo i'll make
some more.. :)
federico
--
Federico Di Gregorio http://people.initd.org/fog
Debian GNU/Linux Developer
fog-8fiUuRrzOP0dnm+yROfE0A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
INIT.D Developer
fog-NGVKUo/i/6DYtjvyW6yDsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
A short story: I want you. I love you. I'll miss you. -- Me
signature.asc
Description: Questa parte del messaggio =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E8?= firmata
_______________________________________________
Psycopg mailing list
Psycopg-IAPFreCvJWPBWskQ1e/+sw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.initd.org/mailman/listinfo/psycopg
| 
