|
Re: [newbie] Question on embedding/extending with boost::python: msg#00318python.c++
Brett Calcott wrote: "Dirk Gerrits" <dirk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:> [snip]
Well I suppose you could expose a visual_stuff_updating_iterator to Python, but extending is of course a much easier and cleaner. What I am doing now is different - I am constructng an engine in C++, I'm not sure I follow. Is engine.cycle() still doing a a->update_yourself_via_python() for every agent? Then where's the speedup compared to the embedded approach? Regards, Dirk Gerrits |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: accessing the python type system: 00318, David Abrahams |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: set_wrapper: 00318, Nicodemus |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [newbie] Question on embedding/extending with boost::pythoni: 00318, Brett Calcott |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [newbie] Question on embedding/extending with boost::python: 00318, Brett Calcott |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |