Re: set_wrapper

Giulio Eulisse wrote:

> If I have a simple class
>
> class A {}
>
> and a function 
>
> void f_A(void){...}
>
> pyste's set_wrapper(A.f,"f_A") should, IMHO, generate
>
> class_< A >("A", init<  >())
>        .def(init< const A & >())
>        .def("f", &f_A)
>    ;
> even if A::f() is not present. Is there a reason why it doesn't?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Giulio

Yeah, it doesn't have support to add methods to classes yet... I will 
look into it. You find the "set_wrapper" syntax good enough for this 
purpose, or perhaps an "add_method(name, func)" would be better?

Note also that the method you are trying to add must receive as first 
argument a reference or a pointer to the class, so your f_A function 
should be:

   void f_A(A&);

Regards,
Nicodemus.