Re: [Python-Dev] Update to Python Documentation Website Request

Jean-Paul Calderone <exarkun@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Hm. But docutils isn't part of the standard library, and the
> documentation refers to it.

Fair enough, because the documentation is generated using Docutils.

> And the docs link to ActivePython and Enthought's Python distribution.

I consider those to be exceptions that prove the rule: they are
âstandard Pythonâ in a different form.

> And they link to things like "Collin Winterâs functional module" and
> Django and PyOpenGL and so forth.

I don't know enough about those to comment.

> I don't think anyone would seriously suggest removing all references to
> third-party software from the Python documentation.

No, and nor did I. I'm suggesting that *adding* such a reference has a
high barrier.

> Perhaps the criterion that David is looking to have is explained is
> that people would probably prefer for his app to get a bit more
> popular before Python itself starts pointing people in its direction.

Right. The process is usually in the following order:

* get the code registered on PyPI

* get a community of users and make the code meet their needs well

* discuss adding some or all of the code to Python, by (in recent years)
  raising the topic on âpython-ideasâ

* defend the proposal against all comers to ensure it's actually a good
  idea

* await further instructions

-- 
 \      âIt seems intuitively obvious to me, which means that it might |
  `\                                           be wrong.â âChris Torek |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@xxxxxxxxxx
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/maillists%40codeha.us