Re[2]: %include

Hello Marcelo,

I've built the CVS version and for that example it works. But only if
working directory is ./module. Otherwise it fails with:
main.i:2: Unable to find 'PartA/main.i'
I think it would be consistent if it would work too.
And when it is implemented you could stop searching files relative to
the working dir;-)

Best regards,
 Kerim                            mailto:warkid@xxxxxxxxx


Wednesday, November 12, 2003, 9:46:53 PM, you wrote:

MM> David already added a patch for your case.

MM> Try the CVS version instead.

MM> Anyway, I have some similar structure in my case,
MM> but I did solve the problem with a lot of explicit -I"dir"
MM> and submakes, ie, changing to every subdirectory
MM> as needed and always running swig 'locally'.

MM> Marcelo

MM> Kerim Borchaev wrote:

>>Hello Scott,
>>
>>Tuesday, November 11, 2003, 8:57:02 PM, you wrote:
>>
>>[fun part skipped;-]
>>
>>SM> You're not a pervert. Just lazy. Maybe a different generation of 
>>programmer.
>>SM> :-) :-) :-)
>>It just happened that I needed to build swig module with working
>>directory other than module's. And it just didn't work.
>>
>>And I had a thought to organize my module like this:
>>
>>/module
>>       /PartA
>>              main.i
>>              subsidiary0.i
>>              subsidiary1.i
>>              ...
>>       /PartB
>>              main.i
>>              subsidiary0.i
>>              subsidiary1.i
>>       main.i
>>
>>with /module/main.i:
>>%include PartA/main.i
>>%include PartB/main.i
>>
>>And each PartX/main.i:
>>%include subsidiary0.i
>>...
>>
>>And I can't see how to do it with current way of searching for includes!
>>
>>Best regards,
>> Kerim                            mailto:warkid@xxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>SM> -scooter
>>
>>SM> Kerim Borchaev wrote:
>>
>>  
>>
>>>>I wonder why no-one proposed this feature before..?
>>>>Anyone ever needed such a behaviour from SWIG? Or I'm just a pervert?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Best regards,
>>>> Kerim                            mailto:warkid@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>Monday, November 10, 2003, 9:36:47 PM, you wrote:
>>>>
>>>>MM> Kerim Borchaev wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>>>Hello David,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Monday, November 10, 2003, 4:44:32 PM, you wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DB> Kerim Borchaev writes:
>>>>>>DB>  > Hello,
>>>>>>DB>  > 
>>>>>>DB>  >   Why doesn't %include search in same folder as the file it was 
>>>>>>used
>>>>>>DB>  >   in?
>>>>>>DB>  > 
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DB> No one has ever requested such a feature ;-).
>>>>>>DB> Should SWIG behave in this way?
>>>>>>Yes! ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>DB> (Does the C preprocessor do this?)
>>>>>>I think it is. Don't know what's in the standard but VC .NET 2003(that's
>>>>>>something about 98% standard compliant;-) works this way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>>>MM> gcc and intel icc compilers do the same, i.e., if you run
>>>>
>>>>MM>   icc/gcc  -c test/test.cc
>>>>
>>>>MM> then, the 'test/' directory is added to the include search path, but
>>>>MM> if you do
>>>>
>>>>MM>   swig -python -c++ test/test.i
>>>>
>>>>MM> then, swig doesn't look inside 'test/', unless of course you add the 
>>>>"-I 
>>>>MM> test/"
>>>>MM> option.
>>>>
>>>>MM> So, Kerim, in the meantime, you can try to add the "-I <your directory" 
>>>>to
>>>>MM> swig and that will work.
>>>>
>>>>MM> Marcelo
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>      
>>>>
>>>>>>Best regards,
>>>>>>Kerim                            mailto:warkid@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>
>>>>>>          
>>>>>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Swig maillist  -  Swig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swig
>>  
>>


_______________________________________________
Swig maillist  -  Swig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swig