RE: Next SWIG release

David Beazley writes:
> 
>         class Base {
>         public:
>             virtual void foo() = 0;
>         };
> 
>         class Bar : public Base {
>         public:
>             virtual void foo();
>         };
> 
> SWIG currently generates two wrapper functions (Base_foo and
> Bar_foo).  However, one of these is redundant---the Base_foo() wrapper 
> could be used for both.  We could modify SWIG to make this
> optimization (and others that are similar).
> 
> Of course, I'm sure there are other things we could do as well.  I'm open
> to ideas on that.

I would really like to see that one fixed soon.

I also vote for including Mark Rose's patch for derived classes.

Jeremy
-- 
Jeremy Slade
Hewlett-Packard Company - Systems & VLSI Technology Division
jeremy.slade@xxxxxx (970) 898-7881

_______________________________________________
Swig maillist  -  Swig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swig