Re: Next SWIG release

At 08:34 PM 1/26/03 -0600, David Beazley wrote:
> Also, if there are any minor feature requests, please let us know.

Now that I think of it, there is the dreaded ownership problem---i.e., the 
fact that seemingly innocent instructions such as:

    foo.bar = Bar()

can cause every kind of trouble if the interface is:

    class Bar;

    class Foo {
      public:
        Bar* bar;
    };

If I'm not mistaken, you had thought about this and started modifying the 
internal SWIG functions so that the reference count of foo.bar could be 
incremented, right? What was the status?

Later,
        Luigi

_______________________________________________
Swig maillist  -  Swig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.cs.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/swig