|
R: Scrum and RUP: msg#00068programming.scrum.general
Marco, > I think it makes sense as long as you "want" to continue to use RUP. Yes. Scrum does not need RUP. RUP needs Scrum practices to be effective. > OK, I don't want to be (too) verbose so just a note: of course you can > successfully customize RUP to reach(?) the Scrum agility but why if > you can reach better result with a different approach? You're right. In the best possible world, where your choices are not constrained by previous ones, there is no reason to use RUP, if something else is better. But there are many IT organizations using RUP in an ineffective way, and Scrum could help them to improve. Sometimes it's difficult to tell these organizations, who made huge investments into RUP: throw it off, there are more effective approaches out there, try them instead. In such cases, I believe, it is better to suggest an improvement using agile practices in the context of the existing process. Adriano Comai http://www.analisi-disegno.com > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: capotribu <abis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:abis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Inviato: martedi 24 dicembre 2002 19.33 > A: scrumdevelopment@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Oggetto: Re: [scrumdevelopment] Scrum and RUP > > > Hi everybody, > > --- "Adriano Comai" <comai@xxxx> wrote: > > having been involved in many RUP customizations, I think RUP_Scrum makes > > sense (much more, in my opinion, than RUP-XP). > > RUP needs _exactly_ the Scrum practices to become agile. > > I think it makes sense as long as you "want" to continue to use RUP. > If you "just" want to implement an agile, effective ecosystem (in the > Highsmith' sense) I think you can leave RUP to those who prefer to > have a plan that they will never respect :-) > > I know this statement might sound a fundamentalist one but I will try > to explain why I think so (after years of effective RUP implementations!): > > RUP is fundamentally a very, very big framework you can (must!) > customize to meet your needs. In the very first months of > customization you usually spend your time cutting off things, docs, > tasks, etc, etc from the RUP framework. > > This is because of the intent of RUP: to cover all the possible > situations and every aspects of every possible development effort! > > After years of experience in this field if a friend of mine will ever > introduce me a new metodology/process/something_else with such a > target I would simply greet him and turn back to my work having no > time to waste. > > But we are speaking about something from Booch, Jacobson and many > other "gurus", something that is so close to the (actual) management > perspective it is impossible to ignore. > > Here is the point: I will no spend time to write why managers like RUP > but Scrum, like all the others Agile ecosystems, makes me think that > what managers want is something that isn't really useful to deliver > the right project and often is the first impediment to the project > success. > > Why have I to spend a lot of months (before starting anything else) to > cut off things from something when I can start with the smallest > useful set of practices NOW and add, if I'll need and only if I'll > really need, others in the future? > > I don't know if you have ever read something about Wolfram's work: > every time you add a rule to a system you increase the complexity of > the system itself but at a certain point adding rules do not increase > complexity anymore (sorry for simplification and for bad English :-)). > We can infer that managing a complex system does not need an > equivalent complex method because at a certain point your effort to > simplify the system will only increase YOUR work! You will need more > work to manage YOU same work, and so on. > > OK, I don't want to be (too) verbose so just a note: of course you can > successfully customize RUP to reach(?) the Scrum agility but why if > you can reach better result with a different approach? > > Happy Xmas :-D > > Marco Abis - CEO & Chairman > Agility SPI: Software Process Improvement > abis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx - abis@xxxxxxx > http://agilemovement.it > To Post a message, send it to: scrumdevelopment@xxxxxxxxxxx To Unsubscribe, send a blank message to: scrumdevelopment-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | FW: [object-technology] [Jeff Sutherland's Object Technology Web Site] Seven Steps to Pain and Suffering with the Rational Unified Process: 00068, Ken Schwaber |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: R: Scrum and RUP: 00068, Marco Abis |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Scrum and RUPi: 00068, capotribu <abis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Next by Thread: | Re: R: Scrum and RUP: 00068, Marco Abis |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |