|
Re: Movie making Vs Software Development: msg#00105programming.language-of-the-year
>The point I'm making with the comparison is that in both cases it's the >talent that counts, not the process. I am in complete agreement that talent matters. But to put all the talent together and guide them and keep on track we need process. But whenever I have attended CMM seminars they put so much important into Process and actually they seems to neglect the talent factor. However when I asked one of the presenter, he mentioned something called People CMM and said that addresses that issue. I have not gone through People CMM so I am not sure how well it addresses Talent issue. Regards Senthoor On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:31:49 -0400, Andrew Hunt <andy-CFUc0I3L9bbJyQSMb4qrZi4gXjV2jqTv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-06-28 at 07:25, 88Pro wrote: > > > I don't quite agree on that since I don't believe there are comparable > > in the first place, here is why! > > Some observations: > > > However for a movie the people who watch it are the users, > > and in my opinion there is no way to capture their requirements. > > You can screen test footage in front of focus groups, etc. You float > various flavors of teasers/trailers ahead of time and gauge reaction. > not that much different from putting users in front of a prototype. > Some movies even changed their endings based on feedback from trial > audiences. Sounds pretty agile to me :-) > > The point I'm making with the comparison is that in both cases it's the > talent that counts, not the process. > > > In software development even if all the requirements are not captured, > > in the next release, those can be accommodated, but movie just has one > > cycle to get it right. > > If there *is* a next release. Often times the team doesn't get a second > chance. As for movies, there's always the possibilty of sequels > (although the Matrix series seemed to lose track of the requirements as > they went on). > > Requirements are only one part of the picture. Having a > director/project leader communicate the vision effectively to the team, > who can then use their disparate specialized skills in concert to create > the work is critical, and applies in both disciplines. > > Don'tcha think? > > /\ndy > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Yahoo! Domains - Claim yours for only $14.70 http://us.click.yahoo.com/Z1wmxD/DREIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pragprog/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: pragprog-unsubscribe-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Movie making Vs Software Development: 00105, Senthoorkumaran Punniamoorthy |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Movie making Vs Software Development: 00105, Ron Jeffries |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Movie making Vs Software Developmenti: 00105, Andrew Hunt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Movie making Vs Software Development: 00105, Ron Jeffries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |