|
RE: Re: Overstepping Qualifications [was: Practice: PairProgramming, Sex, e: msg#00059programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
I am afraid of heights. Especially when I'm stressed, going up in a glass elevator is cause for total terror on my part. My emotions are real. However, they are not "appropriate" in the sense I am using the term, because they do not match the reality of the situation. I'm perfectly safe in the elevator. There is no objective reason for any distress, much less abject terror. I don't think sexual feelings in the workplace are "appropriate" in the same sense. It's not a quiet, candlelit dinner or a cozy car overlooking the lights of the city, it's work. If I get aroused when I sit down to program with a person of my preferred gender, it makes no more objective sense than my terror in an elevator. My feelings don't match the situation. As for being in control of feelings, I think we all influence our feelings. If I'm feeling down, there are things I can do to help myself feel better. I'm certainly responsible for my feelings and their effects on others. And I observe that sexual feelings in the workplace hinder the work of the team. That said, I have gotten several messages that boil down to, "I like feeling aroused sitting next to a programming partner and it's none of your business." I agree that it is none of my business how they feel or what they do. I will continue, however, to point out what I perceive to be the consequences of indulging those feelings. If they want to be aroused at work more than they want the team to work its best, they are free to make that choice and deal with what comes next. Kent Beck Three Rivers Institute -----Original Message----- From: Michael Feathers [mailto:mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:31 PM To: xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xpe2e] Re: Overstepping Qualifications [was: Practice: PairProgramming, Sex, etc] We've probably beaten this one to death, but I just have to say that your use of the phrase "inappropriate feelings" makes me flinch. I don't consider myself to be in control of my feelings. They happen, and I can acknowledge them or not, or act on them or not. I've pretty much assumed that that is the way it is for most people. Beyond that there is the question of whether a person's feelings are their private affair as long as they don't impact the team. Are we aware of all of the feelings that our team members have? We can read body language, but do we know? Is it our business? I'm leery of any enterprise which decides what feelings are appropriate or inappropriate. It seems like an invasion of privacy and something somewhat beyond the work contact. I wish your phraseology was tied to action rather than feeling. Michael Feathers Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00059, Ron Jeffries |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00059, William Wake |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Re: Overstepping Qualifications [was: Practice: PairProgramming, Sex, etc]i: 00059, Michael Feathers |
| Next by Thread: | Defect Cost Increase: 00059, June Kim |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |