|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00049programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
Yes, but that might not be the message that people receive given that you mention 1-4 week cycles in the first edition and 1 week cycles have become the practice in the second. I agree that the week is a natural time scale, and that that is a principle in support of weekly cycles, but what I question is why there must be principled position on weekly or biweekly cycles at all. Why isn't it enough to say that XP favors the shortest cycle that allows meaningful work to be done, gives business sufficient steering and developers sufficient buffer? Putting aside any technical issues that affect how much meaningful work can be done on particular projects, time-period is something that seems amazingly dependent on team-culture and expectations. Some people don't mind being essentially in work queue mode, each day a new iteration. Other people feel that iterations as short as a week feel martial. If the bottleneck shifts out of software, sometimes you can address it and help an organization take advantage of 1 week cycles. If you can't, squeezing the cycle time beyond the comfort level of the customers and developers seems like an unneeded optimization. It's great to help them know what they are capable of, but if people aren't comfortable with it, then why? Why can go back to principles, but what about empiricism? Some teams have settled on cycles larger than a week. If they are comfortable with them and there is no pressing business problem, then why not? Michael Feathers Kent Beck wrote: > I didn't hear anyone say that one size should fit all. I cited one > principle > in support of one-week cycles. I'm sure there are other principles in > support of two-week cycles. I'm interested in hearing them, not in > strawman > arguments. > > Kent Beck > Three Rivers Institute > > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Feathers > [mailto:mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 5:33 PM > To: xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xpe2e] Practice: Weekly Cycle > > Seriously, I don't know what the best cycle time is, but my observation > is that one size really can't fit all. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00049, Kent Beck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00049, Dave Hoover |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What happened to coding standard as a practice?i: 00049, William Wake |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00049, Dave Hoover |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |