|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00038programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
Keith Ray wrote: > I'm talking to a manager interested in agile development, but he > doesn't think *fixed*-length iterations are the way to go. He > understood my explanation about yesterday's weather and being able to > predict progress using burn-down / burn-up charts. He was also > concerned that iteration planning might take up too much time in short > iterations. > > What are the other bullet points in favor of fixed-length iterations > that might persuade him of its usefulness? > I can't really bullet point these right now. A little groggy this morning, but to me, the benefit of fixed iterations is that it forces decision making. If the team is under or over on an iteration, the customer has to be involved. It is one thing to understand velocity and scope adjustment, yet another to concretely encounter them over and over again. The amount of understanding that business people gain through that feedback is invaluable my opinion. Michael Feathers ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00038, Keith Ray |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00038, Ron Jeffries |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00038, Keith Ray |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00038, Ron Jeffries |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |