|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00033programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
Kent Beck wrote: > The problems to be solved are: > * Having a sense of progress > * Having an accurate measure of progress > * Delivering efficiently > * Tracking changing needs > * Building a trust-based relationship inside and outside the team > * Enabling the team to offer accountability > > One of my principles is working with human nature, including natural time > cycles. One week and one month are common cycles. That's why I'm > suspicious > of two-week iterations--fortnights aren't nearly as widely used as either > weeks or months. > > I have a question for those using two week iterations. After the first > week, > how do you know if you are half done? Is this even an interesting > question? On one week cycles, how do we know on Wednesday? Seriously, I don't know what the best cycle time is, but my observation is that one size really can't fit all. Michael Feathers ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Re: Overstepping Qualifications [was: Practice: PairProgramming, Sex, etc]: 00033, Michael Feathers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00033, Erik Lundh |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00033, Zhon Johansen |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00033, Erik Lundh |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |