|
RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00030programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
> From: Kent Beck [mailto:kentb-ihVZJaRskl1bRRN4PJnoQQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] >... > One of my principles is working with human nature, including natural time > cycles. One week and one month are common cycles. That's why I'm > suspicious of two-week iterations--fortnights aren't nearly as > widely used as either weeks or months. Are we perhaps overemphasizing the connection between iteration lengths and human nature? I see little reason to associate human nature with our Gregorian calendar although it's obvious there is a social influence. Basing iteration length on actual lunar cycles might be a more natural choice. I've never heard of a team using that approach. However, I've noticed associated effects on my own creative cycles (based on very unscientific observations). Steve ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00030, Erik Lundh |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00030, Zhon Johansen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00030, Erik Lundh |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00030, Zhon Johansen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |