|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00025programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
we know we're half done if about half of our current iteration's stories are implemented and passing their acceptance tests. On Wed, 15 Dec 2004 09:04:16 -0800, Kent Beck <kentb-ihVZJaRskl1bRRN4PJnoQQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The problems to be solved are: > * Having a sense of progress > * Having an accurate measure of progress > * Delivering efficiently > * Tracking changing needs > * Building a trust-based relationship inside and outside the team > * Enabling the team to offer accountability > > One of my principles is working with human nature, including natural time > cycles. One week and one month are common cycles. That's why I'm suspicious > of two-week iterations--fortnights aren't nearly as widely used as either > weeks or months. > > I have a question for those using two week iterations. After the first week, > how do you know if you are half done? Is this even an interesting question? > > Kent Beck > Three Rivers Institute > > -----Original Message----- > From: mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:23 PM > To: xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xpe2e] Practice: Weekly Cycle > > -----Original Message----- > From: William Wake <william.wake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > All - > When you have two-week iterations, I'm curious what that means: > - do you have twice as many stories "in process"? > - is your typical story unable to be completed in a single week? > - or is a story the "usual" :) size, but you have "wait time" within it? > - do you tie releases to the iteration length at all? > - ... (the other 20 reasons I'm not clever enough to make up here) > > I'm curious about the question behind all of this. What problem are we > trying to solve? I know Scrum teams that have four week sprints and they > work fine for them. Teams I work with tend to have 2 week iterations. > There are two reasons why I occasionally try 1 week iterations: 1) to > develop more practice discipline, and help people learn how to work in > smaller increments, 2) to give the customer more control. But, generally > these are not long term concerns. > > I do see the benefit of shorter iterations, but to me it should be tied to a > concrete problem. Otherwise, aren't we optimizing something that may not > need to be optimized? > > Michael Feathers > http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.MichaelFeathers.TheNewGuy > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- ---- C. Keith Ray <http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/blog/index.html> <http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/xpminifaq.html> <http://homepage.mac.com/keithray/resume2.html> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> $4.98 domain names from Yahoo!. Register anything. http://us.click.yahoo.com/Q7_YsB/neXJAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00025, Kent Beck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00025, david hussman |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00025, Kent Beck |
| Next by Thread: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00025, david hussman |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |