|
RE: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00024programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
The problems to be solved are: * Having a sense of progress * Having an accurate measure of progress * Delivering efficiently * Tracking changing needs * Building a trust-based relationship inside and outside the team * Enabling the team to offer accountability One of my principles is working with human nature, including natural time cycles. One week and one month are common cycles. That's why I'm suspicious of two-week iterations--fortnights aren't nearly as widely used as either weeks or months. I have a question for those using two week iterations. After the first week, how do you know if you are half done? Is this even an interesting question? Kent Beck Three Rivers Institute -----Original Message----- From: mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:mfeathers-mn4gwa5WIIQysxA8WJXlww@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 8:23 PM To: xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xpbookdiscussiongroup-hHKSG33TihhbjbujkaE4pw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [xpe2e] Practice: Weekly Cycle -----Original Message----- From: William Wake <william.wake-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> All - When you have two-week iterations, I'm curious what that means: - do you have twice as many stories "in process"? - is your typical story unable to be completed in a single week? - or is a story the "usual" :) size, but you have "wait time" within it? - do you tie releases to the iteration length at all? - ... (the other 20 reasons I'm not clever enough to make up here) I'm curious about the question behind all of this. What problem are we trying to solve? I know Scrum teams that have four week sprints and they work fine for them. Teams I work with tend to have 2 week iterations. There are two reasons why I occasionally try 1 week iterations: 1) to develop more practice discipline, and help people learn how to work in smaller increments, 2) to give the customer more control. But, generally these are not long term concerns. I do see the benefit of shorter iterations, but to me it should be tied to a concrete problem. Otherwise, aren't we optimizing something that may not need to be optimized? Michael Feathers http://butunclebob.com/ArticleS.MichaelFeathers.TheNewGuy Yahoo! Groups Links ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: Re: Overstepping Qualifications [was: Practice: PairProgramming, Sex, etc]: 00024, Kent Beck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00024, Keith Ray |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00024, William E Caputo |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00024, Keith Ray |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |