|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00095programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
Steve Freeman wrote: > Ron Jeffries wrote: > > I, too, favor weekly iterations. However, I have recently had teems, > > having tried one-week iterations, go to two weeks. I believe this > was due > > to the fact that they were in a legacy situation and the medium was too > > sticky to get much done in a week. If I were doing it, I'd push to > get back > > to a week, but I'd support the stretching to two weeks given where they > > currently found themselves. > > I've had this pattern. We had a legacy codebase and one-week iterations > were just too tight. We compromised on having major/minor weeks: a two > week iteration with some coordination on the off week. Had the project > lasted we would have pushed up the rate. > Same. Two week iterations are the norm for my teams. Michael ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00095, kent beck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00095, Ron Jeffries |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00095, Steve Freeman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00095, Brad Appleton |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |