|
Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: msg#00093programming.extreme-programming.xp-explained2
Ron Jeffries wrote: > I, too, favor weekly iterations. However, I have recently had teems, > having tried one-week iterations, go to two weeks. I believe this was due > to the fact that they were in a legacy situation and the medium was too > sticky to get much done in a week. If I were doing it, I'd push to get back > to a week, but I'd support the stretching to two weeks given where they > currently found themselves. I've had this pattern. We had a legacy codebase and one-week iterations were just too tight. We compromised on having major/minor weeks: a two week iteration with some coordination on the off week. Had the project lasted we would have pushed up the rate. S. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar. Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free! http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/nhFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00093, olibye |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00093, kent beck |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cyclei: 00093, Ron Jeffries |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Practice: Weekly Cycle: 00093, Michael Feathers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |