Re: [discuss] 2.6.19-rc6: known regressions (v4)

On Fri, 24 Nov 2006 10:58:55 +0100
Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> 
> > A slightly smarter, but not quite as obviously correct, 
> 
> I think it's better to go for the "obviously correct" approach right now
> And sorting multiple times should be fine
> 

yup, that's what I'd decided.