ports.x86-64.general (thread)

RE: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Salyzyn, Mark
[PATCH] [65/82] i386/x86-64/ia64: Move polling flag into thread_info_status, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [69/82] i386/x86-64: adjust /proc/interrupts column headings, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [37/82] i386/x86-64: fall back to old-style call trace if no unwinding, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [39/82] i386/x86-64: Consolidate arch/{i386,x86_64}/boot/compressed/misc.c, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [55/82] i386/x86-64: Fix isoimage when syslinux is in /usr/share, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] [55/82] i386/x86-64: Fix isoimage when syslinux is in /usr/share, H. Peter Anvin
[PATCH] [36/82] i386: reliable stack trace support i386 entry.S, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [35/82] i386: reliable stack trace support (i386), Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [16/82] i386/x86-64: simplify ioapic_register_intr(), Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Dave Jones
  - Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Keith Mannthey
    - Re: [PATCH] [20/82] i386: Panic the system when a NUMA kernel doesn't run on IBM NUMA, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Andi Kleen
- Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Alan Cox
  - Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Andi Kleen
    - Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Alan Cox
    - Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Andi Kleen
    - Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Alan Cox
    - Re: [PATCH] [29/82] x86_64: Rename IOMMU option, fix help and mark option embedded., Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [4/82] i386/x86-64: Use new official CPUID to get APICID/core split on AMD platforms, Andi Kleen
[PATCH] [5/82] i386/x86-64: Emulate CPUID4 on AMD, Andi Kleen
[Patch] apic: fix apic error on bootup, Siddha, Suresh B
- Re: [Patch] apic: fix apic error on bootup, Andi Kleen
Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Rohit Seth
  - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Rohit Seth
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC, patch] i386: vgetcpu(), take 2, Rohit Seth
[2.6 patch] x86_64: remove sys32_ni_syscall(), Adrian Bunk
- Re: [2.6 patch] x86_64: remove sys32_ni_syscall(), Andi Kleen
Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Do not use -ffunction-sections for modules, Sergey Vlasov
- Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Do not use -ffunction-sections for modules, Andi Kleen
RE: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Allen Martin
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
  - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Dave Olson
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
    - Message not available
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Greg Lindahl
[PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
- [PATCH 1/25] irq: Convert the move_irq flag from a 32bit word to a single bit, Eric W. Biederman
  - [PATCH 2/25] irq: Add moved_masked_irq, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 3/25] x86_64 irq: Reenable migrating irqs to other cpus., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 5/25] msi: Make the msi boolean tests return either 0 or 1., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 7/25] msi: Refactor the msi_ops., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 10/25] ia64 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 12/25] x86_64 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 13/25] msi: Make the msi code irq based and not vector based., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 14/25] x86_64 irq: Move msi message composition into io_apic.c, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 15/25] i386 irq: Move msi message composition into io_apic.c, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 16/25] msi: Only build msi-apic.c on ia64, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 17/25] x86_64 irq: Remove the msi assumption that irq == vector, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 18/25] i386 irq: Remove the msi assumption that irq == vector, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 19/25] irq: Remove msi hacks, Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 20/25] irq: Generalize the check for HARDIRQ_BITS., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 21/25] x86_64 irq: Make the external irq handlers report their vector, not the irq number., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 22/25] x86_64 irq: make vector_irq per cpu., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 23/25] x86_64 irq: Kill gsi_irq_sharing., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 24/25] x86_64 irq: Kill irq compression., Eric W. Biederman
    - [PATCH 25/25] irq: Document what an IRQ is., Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 11/25] i386 irq: Dynamic irq support, Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
    - Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Benjamin Herrenschmidt
    - Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Jeff Garzik
    - Re: [PATCH 9/25] irq: Add a dynamic irq creation API, Matthew Wilcox
    - Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Roland Dreier
    - Re: [PATCH 8/25] msi: Simplify the msi irq limit policy., Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 7/25] msi: Refactor the msi_ops., Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 6/25] msi: Implement helper functions read_msi_msg and write_msi_msg., Eric W. Biederman
    - Re: [PATCH 5/25] msi: Make the msi boolean tests return either 0 or 1., Jeff Garzik
    - Re: [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Rajesh Shah
    - Re: [PATCH 4/25] msi: Simplify msi enable and disable., Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Rajesh Shah
  - Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
  - [PATCH] Decouple IRQ issues (fix i386 compile issues), Eric W. Biederman
- Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Ingo Molnar
  - Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Greg KH
    - Re: [PATCH 0/25] Decouple IRQ issues (MSI, i386, x86_64, ia64), Eric W. Biederman
Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Dave Olson
- Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
  - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Eric W. Biederman
  - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg Lindahl
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Randy.Dunlap
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg Lindahl
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Dave Olson
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Roland Dreier
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Jeff Garzik
  - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg KH
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg KH
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Roland Dreier
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilitiesKJ, Dave Olson
Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
- Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
  - Message not available
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Brice Goglin
    - Re: [discuss] Re: [RFC] Whitelist chipsets supporting MSI and check Hyper-transport capabilities, Greg Lindahl
FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Alan Cox
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Wolfram Gloger
  - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Steve Munroe
  - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Benjamin Herrenschmidt
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Ulrich Drepper
  - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Ulrich Drepper
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Tony Luck
  - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Gerd Hoffmann
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jakub Jelinek
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jakub Jelinek
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Brent Casavant
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Chase Venters
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Brent Casavant
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Zoltan Menyhart
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: [discuss] Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Jes Sorensen
- Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
  - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Andi Kleen
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
    - Re: FOR REVIEW: New x86-64 vsyscall vgetcpu(), Paul Jackson
[PATCH 2/2] x86_64 stack usage debugging, Eric Sandeen
[PATCH 1/2] (resend) x86_64 stack overflow debugging, Eric Sandeen
- Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] (resend) x86_64 stack overflow debugging, Jan Beulich
  - Re: [discuss] [PATCH 1/2] (resend) x86_64 stack overflow debugging, Andi Kleen
RE: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Langsdorf, Mark
- Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Randy.Dunlap
x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Andi Kleen
- Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Jan Beulich
- Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Chris Schlaeger
- Re: [discuss] x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Ravikiran G Thirumalai
- Re: x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Nigel Cunningham
- Re: x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Muli Ben-Yehuda
- Re: x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Andrew Morton
  - Re: x86_64: x86-64 mailing lists / posting patchkits / x86-64 releases, Andi Kleen
Re: [uml-devel] Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Blaisorblade
- Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Jeff Dike
  - Re: [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Steven James
  - Re: [uml-devel] [discuss] [RFC] [PATCH] Double syscall exit traces on x86_64, Blaisorblade